How this car accident settlement estimator works
This tool mirrors the first-pass valuation framework most liability adjusters use before negotiation. It separates the claim into components and then applies your state's comparative-negligence reduction:
General = Specials × Severity Multiplier Gross = Specials + General + Property
Net = Gross × (1 − Fault %) Range = Gross ± 15%
Economic (special) damages are the provable ledger items: hospital and therapy bills, projected future treatment, and documented lost income. General damages — pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment, emotional distress — are estimated by multiplying specials by a severity factor. Insurers reserve the low end for short, fully resolved soft-tissue treatment and the high end for surgical or permanent injuries with consistent medical records. Property damage is added back un-multiplied, because a bumper does not feel pain.
What whiplash and soft-tissue claims typically settle for
Whiplash (cervical strain/sprain) is the most disputed injury in auto claims because it rarely appears on imaging. As a working baseline, claims with emergency care plus a short course of physical therapy commonly resolve in the $2,500–$15,000 band; cases involving months of therapy or injection protocols trend toward $15,000–$30,000+. Documentation quality, treatment consistency, and local jury verdicts move the real number more than any formula — rear-end collisions with clear liability price materially higher than contested-fault sideswipes with identical injuries.
Factors that push a settlement up or down
- Treatment gap: waiting weeks to see a doctor can halve an adjuster's valuation.
- Policy limits: the at-fault driver's bodily-injury limit is the practical ceiling absent UIM coverage.
- Venue: identical injuries price differently across counties; urban plaintiff-friendly venues command premiums.
- Prior conditions: pre-existing degeneration arguments compress multipliers.
- Recorded statements: early admissions to insurers frequently surface later as discount justifications.
How your state reduces (or bars) recovery
The fault slider models a simple percentage reduction, but the underlying state rule changes the outcome dramatically:
| Negligence regime | Representative states | Effect of your fault |
|---|---|---|
| Pure comparative | California, New York, Arizona, Louisiana | Recovery reduced by your fault %, no threshold. |
| Modified — 51% bar | Texas, Illinois, Georgia, Colorado* | Reduced by fault %, barred once you are 51%+ at fault. |
| Modified — 50% bar | Arkansas, Utah, Minnesota | Reduced by fault %, barred at 50% or more. |
| Pure contributory | Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, D.C. | Any fault can bar recovery entirely — the harshest standard. |
*Statutory bars shift with legislative sessions; verify the current rule in your filing jurisdiction.